
I wanted to have a recognisable and original slab-serif family in our catalogue; one that, when I see it in use, I can say at once: “That’s our font, we made that one.” No matter how much commercial success it may achieve, we want to make fonts that are distinctive and the product of our own design perception. Otherwise it would be pointless to invest time in making a copy of a copy just because the original of the copy of the copy hangs high on selling lists.

To be honest, I can’t remember any; it’s been two and a half years since it was designed and I’m getting old :-)
You’re right. Classical geometric shapes were softened with different kinds of details. Besides the characteristics you mentioned, Stropha contains asymmetric serifs and a gentle difference between horizontal and vertical stems. The drop-shaped counters visually open the characters more, and I think they are also worthy for the overall contrast of the letters. There are also curved crossbars on ‘f’ and ‘t’, which I personally like.
I think Stropha has good rhythm and it’s fairly balanced, which is important, because it’s what gives the total impression of a typeface, no matter how original it is or not. And last, with all its details and characteristics, Stropha ended up neutral and pretty much a universal family that works well in small sizes, while in bigger sizes those distinctions bring a dose of display touches into titles.
Originally published on the Identifont blog. Questions by David Johnson-Davies, answers by Dušan Jelesijević.
Stropha in the catalogue, with the full specimen, glyph set and licences.

