
For a long time I've been thinking of designing a wide, modern-looking family, but left the idea for later because condensed-width typefaces seem to be more versatile and interesting for the market. So, this time I wanted to pay tribute to extended width only; plus, we didn't have something similar in our font catalogue.

Instead of inspiration I would say it was more like need, an urge to have something unique in the sans-serif category, as it is becoming very hard to design something fresh and new nowdays. It's quite a challenging job to design sans-serif in the oversaturated font market, if you want to make something recognisable. So, Epopeya combines a few concepts, and you've mentioned a couple of them: block-shaped letters, spiky terminals, ink-traps, and slab serifs as in ‘S’, ‘C’, and ‘G’. All spiced with display elements of letter architecture, and avoiding classical sans-serif shapes: for example ‘1’, ‘S’, ‘X’, and ‘Y’.
The slanting of the terminals was more a necessity. As you say, the angle changes as the weight gets thicker because the letters become darker, and it's more difficult to achieve legibility in the smaller sizes. On the other hand, cutting the top off the ‘A’ and other characters was planned from the start, as part of the design. Since we've close to 150 font families in our catalogue, it's a challenge when working on a new family not to repeat yourself. With Epopeya, I think we succeeded.
Originally published on the Identifont blog. Questions by David Johnson-Davies, answers by Dušan Jelesijević.
Epopeya in the catalogue, with the full specimen, glyph set and licences.

