
To be honest, as with many previous releases, I just sat and made it without any previous plan or idea of what it should look like at the end. I agree it’s quirky – it combines a sort of Didone style without bottom serifs with display elements, and it looks surprisingly distinctive in my opinion; even more than it should be. I think its distinctiveness probably limits its area of use.

There were no design influences that I’m aware of. Packard Patrician NF might be closer by design to my other release – Bottled Moon – as Monden gives the impression of less freedom in terms of some of the calligraphic elements that Packard Patrician NF and Bottled Moon contain.
Instead of inspiration, I’d say it was more the urge to add something that would make it more unique, and the teardrops gave a dose of contrast to the strict stems; they visually added more flavour in words composed with Monden. Those teardrops, the curvy endings, and the really decorative italic shapes, are all visual characteristics of Monden.
The teardrops caused some complications during design, especially in the heavier weights as they were positionally close to some parts of the letter which could cause letter blackness and visual stuffiness.
In retrospect I would describe Monden as a Didone with hairstyle bangs in a couple of colours and asymmetric cuts.
Originally published on the Identifont blog. Questions by David Johnson-Davies, answers by Dušan Jelesijević.
Monden in the catalogue, with the full specimen, glyph set and licences.

